Professional Japanese Interpretation Services

Japanese Interpreter Osaka | Professional Interpretation & Translation Services

The Art and Science of Safety: An Exhaustive Historical, Chemical, and Technological Analysis of Japanese Cosmetics and Perfumery (Jomon to the Age of AI)

I. The Origins of Japanese Adornment: Spiritual, Ritualistic, and Anthropological Uses (Pre-Classical Eras)

The history of Japanese personal adornment does not begin with secular beauty but with ritual, status, and spiritual necessity. Tracing back to the earliest known periods, the application of color and the use of ornaments were fundamentally tied to the supernatural realm, community status, and survival.

A. Jomon and Yayoi Periods: Pigments, Pottery, and Primitive Shamanism

Archaeological investigation indicates that primitive use of cosmetics, specifically the custom of painting the face with red pigments, existed during the ancient Kofun period (300-710), suggesting that this practice evolved from even earlier traditions.¹ The Jomon and Yayoi peoples, who preceded the classical Japanese state, regularly engaged in seasonal agricultural and magical rites, leaving behind artifacts such as bronze bells and mirrors used in these ceremonies.²

Adornment was central to the establishment of power and the mediation between the human and divine. The Chinese chronicle Wajinden describes Queen Himiko of the land of Wa during a period of civil unrest. Himiko was a shaman priestess who governed her people through “divine spiritualism, magic and sorcery,” maintaining a strong sense of mystique and asceticism.² While the Wajinden records her seclusion, her ability to captivate her people suggests that her public appearances or ritualistic accouterments were highly mediated, signifying the early, non-secular importance of appearance and specialized adornment linked to spiritual authority.²

Furthermore, items of physical decoration served as direct signals of status and value. Jomon society produced various ornaments from materials such as stone, jade, and shell.³ Jade ornaments, specifically beads and pendants, were prized and functioned as status symbols or valuable trade commodities.³ The prevalence of Dogū figurines, which are mostly female and believed to serve spiritual purposes related to shamanic practices or fertility, reinforces the fact that visual communication, whether through symbolic figures or personal ornamentation, was central to social structure and ritual life.³

The trajectory of adornment shifted as communities coalesced. While the initial use of pigments and ornaments in the Jomon and Yayoi periods was connected to securing magical efficacy or divine favor, the practice evolved by the Kofun period into a formal marker of human hierarchy and social position, evidenced by traces of color found on clay haniwa figurines.¹ This transition indicates that as the Japanese political landscape moved from decentralized agricultural communities toward a centralized state, the purpose of cosmetic application shifted from appealing to the supernatural realm to validating social and political dominance.

B. Peripheral Cultures: Traditional Adornment and Camouflage among the Ainu People

The history of Japanese cosmetics must also acknowledge the distinct practices of the Ainu, the native people of Hokkaido and surrounding islands, whose cultural evolution differed significantly from that of the main islands.⁴

Ainu women practiced a unique form of permanent cosmetic application: black tattoos around the lips, which often resembled “clown smiles”.⁵ This practice was primarily intended to attract husbands and acted as a sign of virtue, making it a powerful form of social signaling tied to matrimonial status.⁵ Some women also bore tattoos on their hands. This custom, relying on non-mineral or non-vegetable pigment application, represented an aesthetic system separate from the Yamato tradition. However, this indigenous practice was eventually prohibited by the Japanese government around the beginning of the 19th century, though it continued informally into the 20th century.⁵ The regulatory action against Ainu tattooing highlights an early instance where centralized political authority intervened to define, enforce, and restrict traditional cosmetic norms, demonstrating the state’s power in dictating acceptable aesthetic appearance.

While direct evidence of Ainu cosmetic camouflage is limited, the analysis of their survival practices reveals a profound mastery of natural materials essential for functional appearance. Ainu traditional clothing was often made from materials like the hides and furs of land animals (deer, bear, fox) and sea mammals (seal, sea otter), or from unique fish skin patches.⁴ This functional, adaptive use of natural materials for clothing, combined with hunting methods that included using natural poisons on arrowheads and spears ⁵, suggests a comprehensive knowledge of the natural environment, which would have naturally extended to primitive forms of camouflage techniques necessary for survival and hunting success, even if not defined as “cosmetics” in the modern sense.

II. The Classical Age of Refinement: Aesthetic Standardization and Indigenous Manufacturing (Nara to Heian Periods)

The classical period marks the decisive move toward a sophisticated, purely aesthetic cosmetic culture, initially spurred by foreign influence, which was then consciously redefined to create a uniquely Japanese ideal.

A. Cultural Importation and Localization (6th–8th Century)

The latter half of the sixth century served as a pivotal moment for Japanese culture, as various elements, including Buddhism and advanced continental culture, were imported from China and the Korean peninsula.¹ This cultural influx included rouge, powder, and other sophisticated makeup techniques, transitioning the focus from simple ritual pigments to complex aesthetic application.¹

This period immediately saw the emergence of a domestic manufacturing capability. The development of indigenous production was essential for establishing a self-sustaining cosmetic culture. In 692 AD, a Buddhist priest named Kanjo is historically credited with being the first person to produce lead-based face powder (Oshiroi) domestically in Japan, a product that was presented to and delighted Empress Jito.¹ This event is recognized as the foundational moment for the Japanese chemical cosmetic manufacturing industry, demonstrating the early adoption of foreign scientific knowledge for indigenous production.

B. The Kokufū Bunka Shift: Developing the Unique Japanese Aesthetic

The trajectory of imitation ended during the Heian period (794–1185). Following the suspension of diplomatic embassies to Tang China, a movement known as Kokufū Bunka (National Culture) developed, consciously moving away from continental models.¹ Cosmetics were integral to this cultural assertion, evolving into a highly stylized aesthetic “more attuned to the Japanese sensibility”.¹

This period standardized a distinct, enduring classical look. The Heian ideal mandated extremely long, straight hair for women; the uniform application of stark white face powder (Oshiroi); the plucking of natural eyebrows followed by repainting them higher on the forehead (Hikimayu); and the highly stylized practice of blackening the teeth (Ohaguro).¹ This combination created a distinctive, almost mask-like appearance ⁶, which emphasized aristocratic refinement and detachment from labor.

III. Traditional Ingredients, Production, and Socio-Cultural Differentiation (Muromachi and Edo Periods)

The Muromachi period saw the rise of the warrior houses, and writings from the era confirm the continued use and commercialization of cosmetics.¹ By the Edo period, cosmetic practices reached their height of sophistication and diversity, underpinned by specialized traditional manufacturing.

A. Primary Cosmetics and Their Composition and Manufacture

The primary cosmetics of the classical and early modern periods were highly specific in their composition and production.

1. Oshiroi (White Powder) and Early Toxicity

Oshiroi served as the essential base for the classical aesthetic. Chemically, this white powder contained lead carbonate, possessing the identical toxic composition as ceruse, which was concurrently in use across Renaissance Europe.⁶ Women of high status utilized this highly toxic material to achieve the desired pure white complexion.⁷ This reliance on lead carbonate for the quintessential beauty ideal established a toxicological burden that plagued Japanese public health for centuries, representing a persistent danger in the pursuit of aesthetic perfection.

2. Beni (Red Pigment) and Artisanal Craft

Beni, used as lip rouge and cheek rouge, was a natural cosmetic sourced only from the red pigment meticulously extracted from benibana (safflower) petals.⁸ The production methods were extremely specialized and handcrafted. High-quality Beni was refined to such a degree that, when concentrated, it exhibited an “iridescent green glow,” which served as visible proof of its high grade and the meticulous skill of the craftsman.⁸ This green concentration, when dissolved (紅を溶く, beni o toku), transformed into the deep red pigment required for application.⁸

The Beni industry thrived around Kyoto, the traditional cultural capital, and reached its commercial peak during the Edo period.¹ Although it was an expensive cosmetic, the custom of wearing makeup spread to the common classes as well.⁸ Isehan-honten, established in 1825 in Edo, remains the last beni-ya in Japan to continue using these traditional, unchanged production methods.⁸

The traditional reliance on slow, specialized, and manual extraction techniques, however, proved to be an economic vulnerability. While the iridescent green glow of Beni symbolized exceptional, quality-controlled craftsmanship, the subsequent infiltration of the market by “cheap and versatile chemical dyes” after the Meiji period successfully displaced the traditional industry because synthetics could replicate the desired color at a significantly lower cost and higher scale.⁸ This historical episode illustrates how artisanal purity can quickly become economically unsustainable when confronted with industrial chemistry.

B. The Art of Japanese Perfumery: Kōdō and Aromatic Woods

Japanese perfumery was historically practiced as Kōdō (The Way of Incense), an appreciation ceremony centered on aromatic elements rather than liquid, alcohol-based perfumes.

The raw materials for Kōdō incense are primarily natural gums and resins derived from precious woods and floral ingredients.⁹ Agarwood, also known as aloe or Jinkō, is particularly valued for its deep, rich olfactory qualities, which evolve during combustion.¹⁰

The manufacturing process remains highly artisanal, often performed largely by hand.⁹ Raw materials are loaded into vats for mixing, then extruded into long strings (often resembling spaghetti), or placed into molds for cones and coils.⁹ A defining characteristic of traditional manufacturing is the drying process, where the incense products are laid out meticulously and dried in large rooms where temperature and moisture are ingeniously regulated through a system of wooded shutters and windows.⁹ This method relies on expert, localized environmental control rather than modern mechanical systems.

Table 1: Key Traditional Japanese Cosmetic Ingredients and Applications

C. Regional Styles, Status, and National Norm Formation

During the Edo period, aesthetic standards became codified and simultaneously differentiated by geography and class.¹¹ A clear divergence existed between the major political centers.⁷

In Edo (modern Tokyo), where the Tokugawa shogunate was located, minimal makeup tended to be popular. This preference was likely influenced by the shogunate’s enforcement of sumptuary laws designed to control extravagant displays of wealth and appearance.⁷ In contrast, the citizens of Kyoto and Osaka, the traditional seats of Imperial power, preferred heavy makeup, often emulating the glamorous style of the Imperial Household women, who wore heavy applications to emphasize their prestige.⁷

The dissemination of these evolving styles, which created a national norm in cosmetic use, occurred efficiently even before modern mass media. Styles were derived from centers of prestige—the Shogunate in Edo and the Emperor in Kyoto—and were propagated through two main channels.⁷ First, instructional materials, such as the women’s educational book Woman’s Treasure (女重宝記) published in 1692, formally established makeup as a matter of proper grooming and etiquette.⁷ Second, the renown of specialized craftsmen for products like beni and oshiroi spread product availability and usage trends throughout urban centers.¹ This decentralized but pervasive cultural transmission mechanism allowed localized “art” styles to evolve into recognized national conventions over time.

IV. The Chemical Transition and Public Health Crisis (Meiji to Late Showa Eras)

The transition from the closed Edo period to the industrialized Meiji era marked a shift from dangerous natural cosmetics to potentially dangerous synthetic ones. This era culminated in public health crises that fundamentally reshaped Japan’s regulatory approach.

A. Infiltration of Synthetic Ingredients and Legacy Toxicity

With the rapid Westernization and modernization of the Meiji period, the market was opened to the industrial benefits of modern chemistry. Traditional, high-cost cosmetics were rapidly replaced by synthetic ingredients and cheap, versatile chemical dyes that offered similar results at a fraction of the price and speed, leading to the sharp decline of specialized beni production.⁸

Despite this shift, the most significant toxicity issue was a holdover from tradition: the widespread use of lead carbonate in Oshiroi.⁶ This practice ensured that heavy metal poisoning remained a persistent, serious public health challenge linked directly to beauty consumption until industrial alternatives and subsequent regulatory pressures forced the phasing out of such components.

B. The Regulatory Watershed of 2001

The momentum for comprehensive cosmetic safety reform in Japan was not initiated solely by issues within the beauty industry but was significantly amplified by catastrophic systemic failures in the pharmaceutical sector. Japan faced serious public health crises, including drug-induced hepatitis and AIDS, resulting from the government and pharmaceutical companies neglecting to recall HIV-infected blood coagulation factor preparations imported in the early 1980s.¹²

Concurrently, as the diversity and volume of cosmetic products (including imported lipsticks, foundations, and perfumes) surged globally, the incidence of allergic reactions increased, complicating government oversight.¹² The government struggled to maintain safety assurances against the backdrop of rapidly changing consumer preferences and the influx of new products.¹²

The crisis spurred a fundamental legislative response in 2001, resulting in a significant revision of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (now the Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices). This overhaul represents a definitive departure from a paternalistic safety model to one based on transparency and accountability. The major changes included:

1. Abolition of Pre-Approval: The stringent previous system requiring Ministerial approval for every cosmetic product was terminated.¹²
2. Mandatory Full Ingredient Labeling: A new system required all cosmetic products to disclose their complete ingredient list, allowing consumers to vet products for potential allergens.¹²
3. Shift in Responsibility: The legal responsibility for guaranteeing product safety was formally shifted from the government’s pre-approval process entirely onto the manufacturers and distributors.¹²
4. Permit Requirements: Companies were mandated to obtain initial-level permits for both manufacturing and sales operations, ensuring accountability throughout the supply chain.¹²

The analysis of these reforms demonstrates that major safety advancements are often reactive, driven by catastrophic failures that necessitate restoring consumer confidence and governmental legitimacy. The severity of the drug-induced AIDS crisis provided the necessary political impetus to abandon the antiquated, centralized pre-approval system in favor of a modern, market-driven, transparency model.

V. Modern Safety and Global Regulatory Convergence

Today, Japan’s regulatory environment is characterized by sophistication and vigilance, focusing on chemical control and continuous safety assessment, operating within a global ecosystem of differing safety standards. This ongoing evolutionary process continues to refine what constitutes an acceptable risk.

A. Japan’s Current Chemical Control Framework

Japan utilizes a comprehensive and layered legal framework to regulate chemical safety, protecting both consumers and the environment.¹³ This framework is primarily governed by three statutes:

1. Chemical Substance Control Law (CSCL): This law mandates the registration and reporting of new chemical substances. Any chemical not listed in the CSCL inventory is considered “new” and requires extensive evaluation and notification to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) or the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) prior to manufacture or import.¹³ This places a strong emphasis on preventative safety assessment.
2. Industrial Safety and Health Law (ISHL): Focuses on chemical hazards in the workplace, requiring employers to conduct risk assessments and provide safe environments.¹³
3. Act on Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances: Sets safety data sheet, packaging, and labeling requirements for household items to protect consumers.¹³

Furthermore, Japan enforces strict requirements for Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), Good Quality Practices (GQP), and Good Vigilance Practices (GVP), which collectively ensure quality consistency, proper manufacturing control, and effective post-market surveillance.¹²

B. International Precedents: Restricting CMR Substances

The evolution of chemical safety is a cycle of “trial and error.” History has moved from banning known intentional toxins (like lead) to identifying and restricting emergent risks in modern compounds. Global cosmetic regulation is increasingly focused on the preemptive exclusion of substances deemed unsafe based on contemporary science.

The European Union (EU) exemplifies this pre-emptive approach, particularly regarding substances classified as Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, or Reprotoxic (CMR).¹⁴ The EU and the U.S. (under the FDA and the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022, MoCRA) share the goal of rigorous safety, but their restriction mechanisms can differ significantly.¹⁵

Case Study: The Prohibition of TPO

Trimethylbenzoyl diphenylphosphine oxide (TPO) provides a recent example of the ongoing regulatory tightening. TPO is a substance commonly used in UV gels and hybrid nail polishes, where it functions to help the product harden and cure under UV light.¹⁴ It was previously permitted, albeit often restricted to professional use.¹⁷

However, TPO has since been classified as a CMR Category 1B substance under the EU’s Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation.¹⁷ In May 2025, the European Commission published the 7th CMR Omnibus Regulation, which added TPO and 21 other substances to Annex II of the European Cosmetics Regulation, effectively prohibiting its use.¹⁴ The regulation is severe: TPO-containing products cannot be marketed, supplied, or used in the EU from September 1, 2025, with no allowance for professional users or existing stock to be sold through.¹⁴

The fact that TPO was once permitted before being reclassified as a serious CMR risk underscores that chemical safety is a dynamic process. Ingredients deemed acceptable based on earlier testing may be restricted as analytical techniques and regulatory classification standards improve, demanding constant vigilance and global reformulation efforts.

Table 2: Comparison of Key Global Regulatory Safety Frameworks

VI. Future Vetting and Progress: The Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The cosmetics industry and its regulators are increasingly turning to advanced computational methods to manage safety risks, particularly as the complexity of formulations increases and the threat of digital deception complicates traditional data vetting.

A. AI in Regulatory Compliance and Safety Assurance

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies have already demonstrated their potential in health care by transforming how massive datasets are analyzed to provide new insights and make predictions.¹⁸ This capability is directly leveraged in cosmetic safety, allowing for the rapid execution of in silico testing, which predicts the toxicological profile, ingredient interactions, and systemic safety of novel compounds without requiring extensive and lengthy physical testing. This revolutionizes the traditional, slow process of trial and error in ingredient selection, enabling safer and faster product development.

However, the pursuit of safety now faces a new, unique challenge: the integrity of information itself. The rise of generative AI has created a “volatile information landscape,” where distinguishing authentic consumer feedback and legitimate safety data from fraudulent or fabricated content is increasingly difficult.¹⁹ Regulatory bodies globally are intensifying their scrutiny in response.¹⁹ For instance, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched crackdowns on schemes where AI services are used to produce mass deceptive content, including thousands of potentially false consumer reviews.²⁰

The key role of AI for regulators, therefore, extends beyond predicting chemical effects; it is crucial for ensuring the integrity of the data upon which all chemical safety decisions are based. AI models can be trained to recognize the statistical patterns and linguistic anomalies associated with synthetically generated or falsified data within certification filings and adverse event reports. By automating this data audit function, regulators can conduct stricter vetting, ensuring that regulatory submissions to bodies like the MHLW are not compromised by mass-produced digital fraud. The progression from managing the physical toxicity of a substance to defending against the informational toxicity of digital fraud requires regulatory systems to quickly evolve from focusing primarily on chemistry and toxicology to encompassing data integrity and AI auditing.

VII. Material Science and the Pursuit of Innately Safe Products

The most profound shift in the modern cosmetics industry is the focus on material science, which aims to create products that are inherently safer by optimizing performance through physical design rather than chemical aggression. This drive is fueled by both global sustainability mandates and the continuous pursuit of superior, non-harmful efficacy.

A. The Drive for Sustainability and Safer Feedstocks

Innovation in the chemical and materials sectors is now heavily guided by heightened sustainability targets, including mandates to reduce emissions, minimize waste through increased recycled inputs, and develop inherently safer chemicals.²¹ Policymakers, consumers, and investors are driving demand for new feedstocks and processes that reduce environmental burdens and chemical risks throughout the supply chain.²¹ This global mandate prioritizes the reduction of chemical toxicity from the outset, moving away from relying solely on end-product testing.

B. Leading Japanese R&D Projects: Formulations and Delivery Systems

Japanese companies, particularly those with strong R&D traditions like Shiseido, are leaders in material science, focusing not just on novel ingredients but also on their stability, formulation, and comfortable feel of use on the skin.²²

1. Shape-Shifting Hyaluronic Acid Technology

A significant advancement is the development of Shape-Shifting Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Technology. This research focuses on controlling the volume of the HA molecule. By adding magnesium ions (Mg ions), the HA molecule is caused to shrink. This volume reduction dramatically increases the molecule’s penetration into the stratum corneum compared to normal HA.²²

This focused approach allows for a reduction in inherent risk. By maximizing the efficacy of benign molecules like HA through advanced physical delivery mechanisms, manufacturers can achieve superior aesthetic results while using lower concentrations of active ingredients, thereby lowering the potential for irritation or adverse reactions. This concept, known as “efficacy by design,” eliminates the historical reliance on aggressive or high-concentration chemical components to force results, marking a definitive step toward pharmaceutical-grade product safety.

2. Novel Water-Soluble Polymers

Research has also led to the development of new water-soluble polymers designed to optimize user experience. These components achieve an “unprecedented comfortable feeling,” delivering a rich and thick texture that blends smoothly into the skin without leaving a non-sticky residue after application.²² While seemingly focused on comfort, optimizing the feel of use is crucial for consumer acceptance and consistent adherence to skincare regimens.

C. Analytical Science Advancements

To ensure the safety and efficacy of these advanced formulations, R&D labs are employing high-precision analytical science. Shiseido, for example, is conducting detailed research using non-invasive technologies like near-infrared and Raman spectroscopy.²² These methods allow researchers to observe the distribution of human skin components and how they change in vivo (on the living subject) after product application—a capability that previously required invasive processing of skin sections.²² This real-time, non-harmful physiological feedback allows manufacturers to fine-tune formulations based on the exact biophysical interaction, ensuring the finished cosmetic product is fully optimized and non-harmful.

Table 3: Advanced R&D for Safer Cosmetics

VIII. Synthesis, Conclusion, and Future Research Directions

The history of Japanese cosmetics is defined by a continuous tension between the powerful demand for aesthetic perfection and the practical reality of toxicological risk. Adornment began in the pre-classical eras as a spiritual tool for engaging the divine and establishing early status, evidenced by Jomon rituals and the spiritual authority of Queen Himiko.² This evolved into the highly formalized, aesthetic standards of the Heian and Edo periods, which relied on specialized traditional production (e.g., safflower Beni) but dangerously incorporated heavy metals (lead Oshiroi) to achieve the white ideal.¹

The introduction of industrial chemistry after the Meiji Restoration provided scale but exacerbated risks, culminating in the major public health crises of the late Showa era, which forced the revolutionary 2001 regulatory overhaul.¹² This shift established transparency (full labeling) and mandated manufacturer accountability, moving Japanese safety standards toward modern global models.¹²

The current phase of development is characterized by the convergence of advanced technology and rigorous regulation. The industry now leads the world by integrating three key areas:

1. Strict Chemical Control: Japan maintains stringent frameworks (CSCL) while adapting to global precedents, such as the EU’s pre-emptive bans on CMR substances like TPO.¹³ This demonstrates that the “trial and error” in chemical safety is ongoing, requiring constant reformulation and compliance.
2. Digital Safety Vetting: The industry faces a new front in safety assurance: defending against informational volatility and digital fraud using AI.¹⁹ AI is becoming a critical tool for regulators, ensuring the integrity of the data submitted for product certification.¹⁸
3. Proactive Material Science: Japanese R&D is developing inherently non-harmful products through “efficacy by design,” focusing on advanced delivery systems like Shape-Shifting HA and non-invasive analytical science.²² This approach, optimizing the function of benign molecules, represents the definitive path toward developing pharmaceutical-grade cosmetic products that are maximally effective and minimally harmful.

Future research must continue to focus on applying predictive AI models to rapidly screen novel sustainable feedstocks and improve non-invasive testing methods. Furthermore, global regulatory bodies must seek greater convergence to manage the increasing complexity of international supply chains and shared data integrity challenges posed by sophisticated digital fraud.

References

1. DC Amenity. “The Evolution of Japanese Cosmetics: Safety Standards and Cultural Shifts.” DC Amenity, dcamenity.com/en/the-evolution-of-japanese-cosmetics-safety-standards-and-cultural-shifts/.
2. DataFoundry AI. “Beauty Under Scrutiny: How Cosmetics Brands Are Battling Fraud and Fortifying Safety.” DataFoundry AI, 25 July 2025, datafoundry.ai/2025/07/beauty-under-scrutiny-how-cosmetics-brands-are-battling-fraud-and-fortifying-safety/.
3. Deloitte. “The Future of Materials.” Deloitte Insights, deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/oil-and-gas/the-future-of-materials.html.
4. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). “Cosmetics Prohibited Substances.” ECHA, echa.europa.eu/cosmetics-prohibited-substances.
5. European Commission. “Legislation.” Single Market Economy: Cosmetics, single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cosmetics/legislation_en.
6. EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation. “Cosmetics Japan.” EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation, eu-japan.eu/sites/default/files/publications/docs/cosmetics-japan.pdf.
7. Facts and Details. “Ainu Clothes and Tattoos.” Facts and Details, factsanddetails.com/japan/cat18/sub119/item638.html.
8. Fiveable Content Team. “Jomon and Yayoi Period Art and Artifacts.” Fiveable, fiveable.me/east-asian-art-and-architecture/unit-11/jomon-yayoi-period-art-artifacts/study-guide/KgzqCFDo5J5TY2pQ.
9. Freyr Solutions. “Navigating the Regulatory Landscape of Chemicals in Japan.” Freyr Solutions, freyrsolutions.com/blog/navigating-the-regulatory-landscape-of-chemicals-in-japan.
10. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). “FTC Announces Crackdown on Deceptive AI Claims and Schemes.” FTC News and Events, 17 Sept. 2024, ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/09/ftc-announces-crackdown-deceptive-ai-claims-schemes.
11. Heritage of Japan. “Magic, Superstitions, Religious Rituals of the Yayoi Culture.” Heritage of Japan, heritageofjapan.wordpress.com/yayoi-era-yields-up-rice/lifestyle-and-society-of-the-land-of-wa/entering-the-realm-of-rice-ritual-and-religion/magic-superstitions-religious-rituals-of-the-yayoi-culture/.
12. Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA). “TPO Added to European Union List of Prohibited Ingredients.” HPRA News & Events, 14 May 2025, hpra.ie/news-events/news/article/tpo-added-to-european-union-list-of-prohibited-ingredients.
13. Japan Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA). “History.” JCIA, jcia.org/en/info/history.
14. Lim, Sooha. “History of Beauty Standards in Japan Since Edo Period.” ResearchGate, researchgate.net/publication/394948732_History_of_Beauty_Standards_in_Japan_Since_Edo_Period.
15. MHC Law. “TPO Ban in the EU.” MHC Law Insights, mhc.ie/latest/insights/tpo-ban-in-the-eu.
16. My Japan Clothes. “Kodo, the Japanese Art of Appreciating Perfumes.” My Japan Clothes Blog, myjapanclothes.com/blogs/japan-blog/kodo-the-japanese-art-of-appreciating-perfumes.
17. Nippon Kodo. “How Incense is Made.” Nippon Kodo Culture, nipponkodo.com/culture/made.html.
18. Nippon Kodo. “Outline of Ainu Clothing.” Akarenga-h, akarenga-h.jp/en/hokkaido/ainu/a-01/.
19. OEM Cosmetic. “Japanese Skin Care Ingredients.” OEM Cosmetic Blog, oem-cosmetic.com/en/blog/japanese-skin-care-ingredients.
20. Personal Care Products Council (PCPC). “Global Advocacy.” PCPC, personalcarecouncil.org/public-policy/global-advocacy/.
21. Scribbr. “How to Cite a Website in MLA | Format & Examples.” Scribbr, 5 Mar. 2024, scribbr.com/mla/website-citation/.
22. Shiseido. “Technology in Material Science.” Shiseido R&D, corp.shiseido.com/en/rd/development/material.html.
23. UNR Libraries. “Citing a Website in MLA.” UNR Libraries Help, library.unr.edu/help/quick-how-tos/citing/citing-sources-in-mla-style/citing-a-website-in-mla.
24. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “Artificial Intelligence in Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).” FDA, 29 Sept. 2023, fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-software-medical-device.
25. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA).” FDA, fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/modernization-cosmetics-regulation-act-2022-mocra.
26. Wikipedia. “History of makeup in Japan.” Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_makeup_in_Japan.
27. Wikipedia. “Japanese Traditional Craft: Beni for Cosmetics.” Google Arts & Culture, artsandculture.google.com/story/japanese-traditional-craft-beni-for-cosmetics-museum-of-beni/CAUB-_31O6pLJA?hl=en.
28. Yoshikawa, Masanobu, et al. “Safety Assessment of Plant Extracts Used in Cosmetic Products with Emphasis on Antioxidative, Antimicrobial, and Anti-inflammatory Properties.” MDPI Cosmetics, vol. 10, no. 3, 2023, mdpi.com/2079-9284/10/3/71.