Professional Japanese Interpretation Services

Japanese Interpreter Osaka | Professional Interpretation & Translation Services

The Paradox of English Proficiency Improvement in Japan: An Analysis of the Disparity Between Substantial Investment and Outcomes

Abstract

This paper analyzes the deep-seated paradox in Japan, where despite significant investment of time, money, and resources in English education, the nation’s English proficiency remains at a relatively low level internationally. This study aims to quantify this disparity from multiple perspectives and to elucidate its underlying causes.

The investigation reveals a dual structure in Japan’s investment in English education, where substantial private household spending compensates for relatively low public expenditure. The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) curriculum guidelines have shifted significantly from a traditional grammar-translation method to one that prioritizes the development of communication skills, a transformation that has yielded complex results, as symbolized by the disparity between average scores in reading and listening on the Common Test for University Admissions.

International comparative data, particularly the EF English Proficiency Index (EF EPI), shows that Japanese adult English proficiency is at a “low” level globally, with a long-term declining trend in its ranking. This suggests that rather than an absolute decline in proficiency, Japan has not been able to keep pace with the rapid improvement in English skills in other countries.

This paper delves into the root causes of this paradox from linguistic, phonetic, and socio-cultural perspectives. It suggests that the structural differences between Japanese and English, a cultural tendency to fear making mistakes, and the lack of necessity for daily English use are primary factors impeding the effectiveness of significant educational investment.

1. Introduction 1.1 Statement of the Research Problem

Despite substantial investment in English education and the provision of long-term learning opportunities from primary to higher education, Japan consistently ranks low in international English proficiency rankings. This phenomenon has been a critical research topic for policymakers, businesses, and individual learners for many years. This report aims to quantitatively prove the existence of this paradox by analyzing public and private financial outlays, government-led education curricula, and objective data from major English proficiency tests. Furthermore, it seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding by offering compelling evidence of the complex linguistic, phonetic, and socio-cultural factors underlying this disparity.

1.2 Historical Background of English Education in Japan

The history of English learning in Japan dates back to the Meiji era, when it was introduced as a means of acquiring knowledge (1). At that time, the primary goal was to translate Western literature into Japanese, so the “grammar-translation method,” which focused on grammar and translation, became the dominant approach. This method became deeply embedded in the Japanese education system, serving as the main approach for English education for decades. As a result, many learners, while possessing a rich knowledge of grammar and vocabulary, faced challenges with practical communication skills, particularly speaking and writing.

In recent years, MEXT has attempted to move away from this traditional approach to cope with globalization. This policy shift aims to focus on more practical and communication-oriented education, enabling learners to use English not merely as academic knowledge but as a tool to connect with the world. However, a detailed analysis is needed to understand the impact of this transformation on society as a whole.

1.3 Scope and Methodology

This report utilizes government reports, public test statistical data, and academic research papers as primary sources. The analysis focuses on quantitative data, including public and private financial investment, MEXT curriculum guidelines, and results from major tests such as the EF EPI, TOEIC, Eiken, and the Common Test for University Admissions. This data is used to objectively evaluate the current state of Japan’s English proficiency and to compare its outcomes with those of other countries. The final chapter integrates this quantitative analysis with a discussion of non-educational factors—namely, linguistic, phonetic, and cultural elements—that impede Japan’s English proficiency, providing a comprehensive explanation for this paradox.

2. Macro-Level Investment in English Education 2.1 Public Expenditure and Policy Direction

The Japanese government’s public expenditure on education amounts to 4.1% of its GDP (2). This is below the OECD average of 5% and is the fourth lowest among OECD member countries (2). This data indicates that the proportion of public spending on education in Japan is relatively low compared to other countries. However, per-student expenditure is at a relatively high level (2). This seemingly contradictory fact suggests that the public education system in Japan may be efficiently allocating limited resources.

MEXT is actively strengthening scholarship programs to promote Japanese students’ study abroad. The budget for 2024 is requested to be a significant increase to 11.4 billion yen from 7.1 billion yen in 2022-2023, with a goal of raising the number of scholarship recipients to 30,000 by 2024 (4). This policy responds to MEXT’s own survey findings that students feel economic barriers to studying abroad (4), indicating that the government prioritizes practical overseas experience to improve English learning outcomes.

However, the low public expenditure and high private spending create a dual structure. This suggests that people who feel the education provided by the public system is insufficient for acquiring adequate English proficiency are making private investments to supplement it.

2.2 Private Sector and Household Investment

Japan’s English education market is supported by significant household investment. The market size for foreign language instruction businesses in Japan, including language schools, online learning, software, language tests, and study abroad, is estimated at $8.76 billion (approximately 1.3 trillion yen) (5). Another survey reports that the total market size for the English industry, including language schools, learning materials, and related businesses, has reached 7.82 trillion yen, with the foreign language class market alone projected to grow to 350 billion yen by 2030 (6).

At the individual household level, the monthly cost of an English conversation school is typically 20,000 to 30,000 yen for adults and 8,000 to 25,000 yen for children (8), with some high-cost business English private lessons priced at 8,000 yen per hour (12). This massive market clearly indicates that many learners feel school education is insufficient and are trying to improve their English proficiency at their own expense.

However, a problem is that this large-scale private investment does not always lead to sustainable results. It is pointed out that many consumers in the English learning market are “repeaters,” who start English conversation schools or materials, get frustrated, and then start again (13). This phenomenon highlights a situation where, despite high motivation to learn English, the effort does not translate into effective skill improvement. The data that 60% of learners have used the AI English conversation apps that have recently emerged (14) suggests that these learners may be seeking more accessible and less stressful learning methods.

3. The Evolving English Education Curriculum

3.1 Primary and Junior High School

A fundamental review of the English education curriculum in Japan has been progressing, moving from the grammar-translation method to a communication-centered approach. With the 2020 (Reiwa 2) curriculum guidelines revision, English education became mandatory from the third grade of primary school (15). In the third and fourth grades, “Foreign Language Activities” are allocated one hour per week, or 35 hours per year, focusing on the two skills and three areas of listening and speaking (“interaction” and “presentation”) (16). The main goal is to increase exposure to English through quizzes, songs, and dances to boost motivation for full-fledged English learning (16).

In the fifth and sixth grades, English becomes an official subject with approximately two hours of classes per week, or 70 hours per year. At this stage, improving reading and writing “literacy” skills is also emphasized, and students are required to acquire basic grammatical expressions such as be verbs and regular verbs while also using the Roman alphabet (16).

The results of this educational reform are measured by MEXT’s target values. The goal is for junior high school graduates to acquire English proficiency equivalent to Eiken Grade 3 or higher (17). According to a MEXT survey for the 2024 academic year, the percentage of public junior high school third-year students who met this standard was 52.4% (19). This is an improvement of 2.4 percentage points from the previous year, showing progress toward the government’s goal of over 60% by 2027.

3.2 High School and Higher Education

In high school, although English is not a mandatory subject, it is considered very important because it is directly linked to university entrance exams. Since the 2022 curriculum guidelines revision, the name of the “English Expression” class was changed to “Logic and Expression,” with a strong emphasis on strengthening speaking and writing skills through debates and discussions (15). MEXT’s goal is for high school graduates to acquire English proficiency equivalent to Eiken Pre-2 or higher (17). A 2024 survey showed that 51.6% of public high school third-year students met this standard (19). The percentage of students who reached the higher level of Eiken Grade 2 or above was 21.2%, also showing an improvement from the previous year (19).

The role of English in university education has also diversified. Many universities have introduced small-group classes and integrated curricula to improve students’ English communication skills by teaching the four skills (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) (20). Furthermore, some universities, such as Sophia University and Meiji University, offer English-taught programs where all classes are conducted in English, and a bachelor’s degree can be obtained without requiring Japanese proficiency (21). These programs aim to enable students to learn in an international environment and gain a global perspective, positioning English not just as a subject but as a tool for acquiring knowledge and solving problems (20).

Table 1: Evolution of English Education in MEXT Curriculum Guidelines (Primary to Higher Education)

4. Quantitative Evaluation of English Proficiency

4.1 Global Standing and Trends

One of the most widely cited metrics for measuring international English proficiency is the EF English Proficiency Index (EF EPI). According to the 2024 EF EPI, Japan ranks 92nd out of 116 non-English-speaking countries and regions, classified in the “low proficiency” band (24). This is Japan’s lowest-ever ranking (25). In comparison, the Philippines ranks 22nd, Malaysia 26th, China 91st, and neighboring South Korea ranks 50th (26).

It is noteworthy that Japan’s ranking in the EF EPI has been declining annually as the number of surveyed countries has increased, from a relatively high position of 14th out of 40 countries in the inaugural 2011 survey (25). A representative from EF Education First’s Japanese subsidiary stated, “It’s not so much that Japan’s English proficiency is declining, but rather that Japan is not keeping up with the momentum of improvement in other countries and regions” (25). This suggests that despite Japan’s significant investment in English learning, its outcomes are falling behind the pace of global competition.

Table 2: Changes in Japan’s EF EPI Ranking

4.2 Domestic English Proficiency Indicators

Data from widely used domestic tests in Japan are also important indicators for understanding the current state of English proficiency.

TOEIC

TOEIC is a test widely used by Japanese companies and universities to measure English communication skills in a business context (29). The TOEIC score recommended by MEXT for employment in Japanese companies is 545, but the average score of Japanese university students is 523, falling short of this standard (32). This fact suggests that many students may be at a disadvantage in job hunting regarding English proficiency. Furthermore, data from one university’s Faculty of Foreign Studies shows that the average TOEIC score upon enrollment is 509, which improves to 648 at graduation (32). While this shows that university education is yielding some results, it also highlights the reality that approximately 24% of all graduates do not reach the MEXT-recommended score of 545 (32).

Common Test for University Admissions

The Common Test for University Admissions is a high-stakes standardized test to measure the achievement of high school education based on MEXT guidelines (33). The results of the 2024 test symbolize the complex outcomes of the transformation of English education in Japan. The average score for English reading was 51.54, the lowest ever, including its predecessor, the National Center Test for University Admissions (35), while the average score for English listening reached a record high of 67.24 (35). This clear trend of “improving listening while reading stagnates or declines” suggests that MEXT’s recent policy of emphasizing communicative skills like “listening” and “speaking” is indeed affecting students’ abilities. This can also be interpreted as evidence of the declining relative importance of reading skills, which were prioritized in the traditional grammar-translation method.

5. Analysis of Major English Proficiency Tests 5.1 Eiken, TOEIC, and the Common Test for University Admissions

The evaluation of English proficiency in Japan is conducted through multiple tests with diverse purposes. Understanding the nature of these tests is crucial for grasping the context of proficiency measurement.

Eiken (Practical English Proficiency Test)

• Purpose and Features: One of the most widely recognized English tests in Japan, aimed at measuring “practical English ability” (18). It is also used for university admissions and credit recognition (18).
• Format: Divided into seven levels (from Grade 5 to Grade 1) with pass/fail results (29), each targeting a different proficiency level (17). All levels evaluate the four skills of listening, reading, writing, and speaking (38).
• Evaluation Method: The criterion is passing the test for each grade, but a CSE (Common Scale for English) score is also provided to allow for objective assessment of learning progress (38).

TOEIC (Test of English for International Communication)

• Purpose and Features: Aims to measure “English for international communication,” primarily evaluating English proficiency in a business environment (29). It is widely used by companies as a criterion for promotion and hiring (39).
• Format: All test-takers take the same single test, and a score indicates their proficiency level (29). The L&R (Listening & Reading) test, which focuses on receptive skills, is the most common, but a separate S&W (Speaking & Writing) test is also available (30).
• Evaluation Method: A score from 10 to 990 is given, so there is no pass/fail, allowing for a detailed understanding of one’s proficiency level (41).

Common Test for University Admissions

• Purpose and Features: A standardized test to measure the academic achievement of high school education for university applicants (33).
• Format: Consists of two parts: a written exam (reading) and a listening section (33). All questions are multiple-choice (33). The written section is scored out of 200 points, and the listening section is scored out of 50 points (33). The audio is played via an IC player (34).
• Evaluation Method: The score is used to determine admission to universities (34).

5.2 UN English Proficiency Test and Other Qualifications

The UN English Proficiency Test is characterized by its comprehensive assessment of “international communication skills” beyond general English proficiency (43). The test includes topics on international current events, politics, and the environment, and requires the ability to logically express one’s opinions (43). At the Special A-level and above, interviewers include retired diplomats and university professors who conduct more specialized discussions (43). This test is highly regarded by government agencies such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, JICA, and the Metropolitan Police Department (43).

Table 3: Comparative Analysis of Major English Proficiency Tests

6. Sociolinguistic and Cultural Foundations

6.1 Linguistic and Phonetic Differences

There are deep-seated linguistic and phonetic differences between Japanese and English that impede the effectiveness of the substantial investment in English education.

Linguistic Differences

The grammatical structure of Japanese is Subject-Object-Verb (SOV), whereas English is Subject-Verb-Object (SVO) (47). This fundamental difference is a major obstacle for Japanese speakers when composing English sentences. Additionally, in Japanese, the subject is often omitted when clear from the context, which is rare in English (47). In addition to these structural differences, English has Germanic and Latin roots, while Japanese has its own unique lexical system, resulting in few shared vocabulary words (47). These factors combine to make English composition a particularly difficult task for Japanese speakers, requiring the integration of logical thinking with grammatical and lexical knowledge (48).

Phonetic Differences

The phonetic system of Japanese is based on a syllable structure composed of one consonant and one vowel (47). In contrast, English has diverse vowels and complex consonant clusters, which cause significant difficulty for Japanese speakers in both listening and pronunciation. The most notorious example is the distinction between /r/ and /l/, which does not exist in Japanese. Japanese speakers tend to assimilate both sounds to a flapped alveolar approximant similar to the Japanese /r/ (48). Similarly, the English /v/ is often replaced by /b/, and the voiceless dental fricative /θ/ is often replaced by /s/ or /z/ (47). Furthermore, while Japanese words typically have only one pronunciation, English words can have multiple acceptable pronunciations, which adds to the complexity of learning (47).

According to one Japanese speaker, listening and reading can be improved through “passive contact,” but speaking and writing require “active effort,” and these two skills are the most difficult to acquire (48). This view supports the notion that linguistic and phonetic barriers impede the acquisition of productive skills (speaking and writing) in particular.

6.2 Cultural and Social Factors

The unique cultural and social structure of Japanese society is also a major factor hindering the improvement of English proficiency.

Homogeneity and Lack of Necessity for English

Japan is an extremely homogeneous society, with over 98% of the population speaking Japanese as their primary language (50). The percentage of immigrants is also very low, ranking 133rd in the world (51). As a result, there is little to no pressing need to speak English in daily life (51). Language is an essential element for maintaining society and keeping people connected (52), and without an environment where that language is essential, a strong motivation for learning is difficult to cultivate.

Cultural and Psychological Barriers

The concept of “perfectionism” deeply rooted in Japanese culture creates a psychological barrier of “fear of making mistakes” in English learning (47). This psychology leads to a tendency for learners to hesitate to speak unless they are confident in their fluency. As a result, opportunities to practice the most crucial skill, speaking, are severely limited, and opportunities to apply learned knowledge in practice are lost. This “fear of making mistakes” psychology may also be related to the evaluation system in educational institutions, which could incentivize students to focus on paper tests requiring accurate answers rather than communicative activities where mistakes are more likely.

This “lack of necessity” and “culture of fear of mistakes” form a “negative spiral” that impedes the effectiveness of investment. Since there are few opportunities to use English in daily life, learners’ motivation tends to shift from intrinsic (e.g., enjoying cross-cultural exchange) to extrinsic (e.g., passing an exam, getting a good job). This extrinsic motivation encourages a focus on memorizing perfect knowledge and passive learning methods, which hinders the development of actual communication skills. Consequently, the large investment increases the number of people who “know English” but does not sufficiently produce people who can “use English.” This situation is supported by the fact that the Japanese English learning market was once called the market of “the necessity to learn” (13).

7. Conclusion: Synthesis of Findings and Recommendations

The analysis in this paper clearly suggests that the paradox in Japan’s English proficiency is not merely a problem of insufficient investment or effort. It is a result of a complex interplay of the dynamics of public and private spending, the transformation of curriculum guidelines, and deeper-rooted socio-systemic issues, particularly the lack of necessity for communication and cultural-psychological barriers.

MEXT’s promotion of a communication-oriented curriculum shows some results in the form of improved average listening scores on the Common Test for University Admissions (35). This is evidence that the reform is penetrating the educational field. However, this progress is slow compared to the pace of English proficiency improvement in other countries, and as a result, Japan continues to decline in international rankings (25).

To resolve this disparity and foster truly globally competent English proficiency, both the educational system and the cultural approach need to be transformed. The following are recommendations derived from the analysis in this paper:

First, increase opportunities for learners to practice in low-risk environments without the fear of failure. This can be achieved through the use of technologies like AI English conversation apps and programs that encourage interaction outside of class (14).

Second, companies and universities should place more emphasis on tests that evaluate practical communication skills (TOEIC S&W, Eiken interview tests, etc.) rather than just passive skills (TOEIC L&R). This can shift learners’ motivation from “getting a high score on a test” to “actually being able to use English.”

Third, the role of English needs to be redefined from a mere exam subject or a tool for job hunting to a means for international exchange and personal growth. As some universities have positioned English as a “tool for problem-solving” (20), expanding the role of English in society as a whole to include the acquisition of knowledge and communication itself will be the key to fostering intrinsic motivation and leading to continuous learning.

Citations

1. Researchgate. “Why Japan needs English.” Researchgate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320838174_Why_Japan_needs_English. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
2. “Education in Japan.” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Japan. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
3. Reddit. “Japan’s Spending on Education 4th Lowest among OECD Countries.” Reddit, 28 Jan. 2014, https://www.reddit.com/r/japannews/comments/1ngjw4p/japans_spending_on_education_4th_lowest_among/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
4. British Council. “Japan to Boost Government Scholarships by 70 Percent.” British Council, https://opportunities-insight.britishcouncil.org/short-articles/news/japan-boost-government-scholarships-70-percent. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
5. U.S. Department of Commerce. “Japan: English Language Education.” Trade.gov, 13 Feb. 2024, https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/japan-update-english-language-education. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
6. “English Business in Japan.” Business Eye 369, 31 Mar. 2024, https://businesseye369.com/business/364/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
7. Yano Research Institute. “Press Release: English Language Education Market in Japan.” Yano Research Institute, https://www.yanoresearch.com/press/press.php/3369. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
8. English Factor. “English School Price List.” English Factor, https://englishfactor.jp/media/englishschool/school-price/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
9. Weblio. “Ninja English Conversation Price.” Weblio, https://eikaiwa.weblio.jp/ninja-eikaiwa/english-conversation-price. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
10. Man-abi.com. “English Conversation Class Standard Cost.” Man-abi.com, https://www.man-abi.com/eikaiwa-std-cost/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
11. Benesse. “Learning Costs.” Benesse, 16 Feb. 2021, https://benesse.jp/kyouiku/202102/20210216-1.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
12. Reddit. “Lesson Fees: Japanese versus English.” Reddit, 18 Dec. 2023, https://www.reddit.com/r/teachinginjapan/comments/18n60qj/lesson_fees_japanese_versus_english/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
13. Japan Education Forum. “Trends in English Language Learning.” Japan Education Forum, https://www.jef.or.jp/journal/pdf/trends1_8709.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
14. PR Times. “AI English Conversation App Use.” PR Times, https://prtimes.jp/main/html/rd/p/000000118.000017082.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
15. AJET. “Finding Treatment, Procedure, and Insurance.” AJET, https://ajet.net/resources/teaching-resources/finding-treatment-procedure-and-insurance-2/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
16. Winbe. “MEXT Curriculum.” Winbe, https://www.winbe.jp/column/column_01/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
17. Eiken Foundation of Japan. “Eiken Grades.” Eiken, https://www.eiken.or.jp/eiken/en/grades/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
18. “STEP Eiken.” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STEP_Eiken. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
19. The Japan Times. “English Proficiency Improvement.” The Japan Times, 24 June 2025, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/06/24/japan/english-proficiency-improvement/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
20. Tsuda University. “English Language Education.” Tsuda University, https://www.tsuda.ac.jp/learning/english.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
21. Sophia University. “English-Taught Programs.” Sophia University, https://www.sophia.ac.jp/eng/academics/global-education/learning/english-taught-program/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
22. Meiji University. “Degree Programs in English.” Meiji University, https://www.meiji.ac.jp/cip/english/admissions/degree-programs-in-english/index.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
23. MEXT. “Junior High School Curriculum.” MEXT, 18 Mar. 2019, https://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/03/18/1387018_010.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
24. The History of English. “How Many People in Japan Speak English.” The History of English, https://www.thehistoryofenglish.com/how-many-people-in-japan-speak-english. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
25. Tokyo Weekender. “Japan Drops to 92nd in English Proficiency Index.” Tokyo Weekender, https://www.tokyoweekender.com/japan-life/news-and-opinion/japan-drops-to-92nd-in-english-proficiency-index/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
26. Nippon.com. “English Proficiency Rankings.” Nippon.com, 24 Nov. 2023, https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02199/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
27. “EF English Proficiency Index.” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EF_English_Proficiency_Index. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
28. EF Education First. “EF English Proficiency Index.” EF Education First, https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/regions/asia/japan/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
29. SGU. “TOEIC Exam Information.” SGU, https://student.sguc.ac.jp/uploads/page/unit/files/090b0520cbba97668af19e7a31d6ad23.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
30. Baildon, Martin. “The TOEIC Test.” Nanzan University, https://nanzan-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/3978/files/acabungo111_11_baildon_martin.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
31. IIBC. “TOEIC Official Data.” IIBC, https://www.iibc-global.org/hubfs/library/default/english/toeic/official_data/pdf/DAA_english_2022.pdf?hsLang=ja. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
32. Boyes, N. “TOEIC Scores in Japan.” Researchmap, https://researchmap.jp/nboyes/published_papers/43758517/attachment_file.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
33. Researchgate. “The National Center Test for University Admissions.” Researchgate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275576407_The_National_Center_Test_for_University_Admissions. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
34. “National Center Test for University Admissions.” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_Test_for_University_Admissions. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
35. University Journal. “Common Test Score Analysis.” University Journal, 18 Jan. 2024, https://univ-journal.net/242215/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
36. U-Press Center. “Common Test Results.” U-Press Center, https://www.u-presscenter.jp/article/post-52475.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
37. Benesse. “Sundai Common Test Prediction.” Benesse, https://dn-sundai.benesse.ne.jp/dn/center/sokuhou/yosou/index.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
38. Eiken Foundation of Japan. “Eiken Tests Overview.” Eiken, https://www.eiken.or.jp/eiken/en/eiken-tests/overview/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
39. ETS. “TOEIC.” ETS, https://www.ets.org/toeic.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
40. Awaya, Akemi. “Do Eiken and TOEIC Scores Really Reflect English Proficiency?” Medium, 3 Nov. 2024, https://medium.com/@awaya373/do-eiken-and-toeic-scores-really-reflect-english-proficiency-7aeac466c5b9. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
41. MK. “TOEIC Score.” MK, https://www.mk.co.kr/en/special-edition/11026777. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
42. The Korea Times. “Koreans Rank 2nd in Asia on TOEIC Scores.” The Korea Times, 27 May 2021, https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/society/20210527/koreans-rank-2nd-in-asia-on-toeic-scores. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
43. UN Association of Japan. “About the UN Test.” UN Association of Japan, http://www.kokureneiken.jp/about/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
44. Agaroot. “United Nations Associations Test of English.” Agaroot, https://agaroot.co.jp/shikaku/united-nations-associations-test-of-english/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
45. Eiken Foundation of Japan. “Eiken Test Statistics.” Eiken, https://www.eiken.or.jp/eiken/en/eiken-tests/stats/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
46. ETS Global. “2017 Report on Test Takers Worldwide.” ETS Global, https://www.etsglobal.org/iq/en/blog/news/2017-report-on-test-takers-worldwide. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
47. JAY-Japan. “6 Eye-Opening Reasons Why Japanese Speakers Struggle with English.” JAY-Japan, https://www.jay-japan.com/blogs/pulse-japan/6-eye-opening-reasons-why-japanese-speakers-struggle-with-english. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
48. Reddit. “As a Japanese, What do You Think are the Reasons Why It’s so Difficult to Learn English for You Guys?” Reddit, 24 July 2024, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAJapanese/comments/1ilzfre/as_a_japanese_what_do_you_think_are_the/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
49. JALT Publications. “Language Barriers in Japan.” JALT Publications, https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/43.2-tlt-art1.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
50. “Japan’s Linguistic Homogeneity.” Generalitat de Catalunya, https://www.gencat.cat/llengua/noves/noves/hm02tardor/internacional/a_nobuyuki.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
51. Hokkaido University. “The Role of English in Japan.” Hokkaido University, https://www.global.hokudai.ac.jp/news/7329. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
52. IAFOR. “The Role of Language.” IAFOR, https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/acss2015/ACSS2015_13569.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
53. Cedarville University. “Japanese and English Language Differences.” Cedarville University, https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=education_theses. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
54. Reddit. “Where to Find the Most Comprehensive Up-to-Date Information on Japanese MEXT Curriculum?” Reddit, 4 Dec. 2023, https://www.reddit.com/r/teachinginjapan/comments/18b2oqa/where_to_find_the_most_comprehensive_uptodate/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
55. Weblio. “Learning Curriculum.” Weblio, https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/%E5%AD%A6%E7%BF%92%E6%8C%87%E5%B0%8E%E8%A6%81%E9%A0%98. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
56. Linden Hall Elementary School. “Curriculum.” Linden Hall Elementary School, https://en.lindenhall.ed.jp/elementary/education/curriculum/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
57. MEXT. “Elementary School Education.” MEXT, https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/elsec/1373870.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
58. Macrotrends. “Japan Education Spending.” Macrotrends, https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/jpn/japan/education-spending. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
59. Xinhua. “Japan Education Report.” English.news.cn, 6 Feb. 2024, https://english.news.cn/20240206/12f96abcbfa0450cb7ab904142bd0dc8/c.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
60. EF Education First. “About the EPI.” EF Education First, https://www.ef.co.uk/epi/about-epi/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
61. English Phonetics. “Which Should I Take: The Eiken or TOEIC Test?” English Phonetics, https://englishphonetics.net/blog/Which-should-I-take-the-Eiken-or-TOEIC-test.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
62. National Cancer Center. “English Proficiency Level Comparison Table.” National Cancer Center, https://www.ncc.go.jp/en/ncc-about/training_prog/EnglishProficiencyLevel_ComparisonTableFY2025.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
63. “Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_European_Framework_of_Reference_for_Languages. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
64. ETS. “TOEIC Mapping CEFR.” ETS, https://www.ets.org/pdfs/toeic/toeic-mapping-cefr-reference.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
65. Global English Test. “English Proficiency Rankings.” Global English Test, https://globalenglishtest.com/english-proficiency-rankings-2025-best-english-speaking-countries/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
66. The Japan Times. “English Language Learning in Japan.” The Japan Times, 17 Feb. 2025, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2025/02/17/japan/english-language-learning-japan/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
67. The Japan Times. “English Conversational Schools.” The Japan Times, 17 Feb. 2025, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2025/02/17/japan/english-language-learning-japan/#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20biggest%20problems,for%20an%20English%20conversational%20school. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
68. MEXT. “Overview of Education in Japan.” MEXT, https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/overview/index.htm. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
69. Teach For Japan. “The Current State of English Education in Japan.” Teach For Japan, https://teachforjapan.org/journal/9514/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
70. Export to Japan. “Identifying Opportunities in the English Language Training Market in Japan.” Export to Japan, https://exporttojapan.co.uk/identifying-opportunities-english-language-training-market-japan/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
71. ETS Global. “ETS Global.” ETS Global, https://www.etsglobal.org/fr/en. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
72. Eiken Foundation of Japan. “Eiken Tests.” Eiken, https://www.eiken.or.jp/eiken/en/eiken-tests/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
73. Eiken Foundation of Japan. “Eiken.” Eiken, https://www.eiken.or.jp/eiken/en/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
74. Travel and Tour World. “Japan Ranks First for Tourists Looking to Return.” Travel and Tour World, https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/discover-japans-timeless-charm-the-country-ranks-first-for-tourists-looking-to-return/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
75. Moomoo. “Japan’s Inbound Luxury Travel Surges Past Global Growth.” Moomoo, https://www.moomoo.com/news/post/58778447/japan-s-inbound-luxury-travel-surges-past-global-growth. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
76. ProQuest. “Japanese and English.” ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com/openview/64ddefdc9d1bf77df1773115c7235fa2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
77. ETS. “Understand Scores.” ETS, https://www.ets.org/toefl/test-takers/ibt/scores/understand-scores.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
78. ETS. “TOEFL iBT Test Score Data Summary.” ETS, https://www.ets.org/pdfs/toefl/toefl-ibt-test-score-data-summary-2023.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
79. ETS. “Research Report.” ETS, https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-17-05.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
80. IIBC. “Worldwide2022 SW English.” IIBC, https://www.iibc-global.org/hubfs/library/default/english/toeic/official_data/pdf/Worldwide2022_SW_english.pdf?hsLang=ja. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
81. Kansai University. “Publication.” Kansai University, https://www.kansai-u.ac.jp/fl/publication/pdf_education/01/1kawai.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
82. British Council. “IELTS Japan.” British Council, https://www.britishcouncil.jp/en/exam/ielts/study-work-abroad/japan. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.
83. Rikkyo University. “Admissions Requirements.” Rikkyo University, https://en.admission.rikkyo.ac.jp/browse/admissions-requirements/. Accessed 24 Sept. 2025.